Form 483

Integra LifeSciences Corporation Form 483, 2010-01-20

FDA issued a Form 483 to Integra LifeSciences Corporation on 2010-01-20 with 6 public-safe observations.

483· Form 483 issued6 observations

Integra LifeSciences Corporation · Salt Lake City, United States · Issued January 20, 2010

Overview

  • 6 public-safe observations are available for this inspection.
  • 6 structured CFR citations are represented.
  • 2 investigators are tied to this Form 483.

Inspectional observations

Each observation cites the regulation FDA found the firm out of compliance with.

20 Jan 2010
21 CFR 820.22

Quality Audit/Reaudit - conducted

Cited by James R Montero, Ginger M Sykes

20 Jan 2010
21 CFR 820.70(a)

Process control procedures

Cited by James R Montero, Ginger M Sykes

20 Jan 2010
21 CFR 820.75(a)

Documentation

Cited by James R Montero, Ginger M Sykes

20 Jan 2010
21 CFR 820.80(a)

Lack of or inadequate procedures - Acceptance activities

Cited by James R Montero, Ginger M Sykes

20 Jan 2010
21 CFR 820.80(d)(2)

Review of data and documentation

Cited by James R Montero, Ginger M Sykes

Inspected site

ILIntegra LifeSciences CorporationSalt Lake City, United States

Inspection team

Cited regulations

CFR citations associated with this Form 483.

CitationWhat it coversCited
21 CFR 820.22Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x
21 CFR 820.70(a)Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x
21 CFR 820.75(a)Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x
21 CFR 820.80(a)Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x
21 CFR 820.80(d)(2)Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x
21 CFR 820.90(a)Cited across public-safe Form 483 observations1x

Source document

PDF
PDF available

Form 483 source document

The source document is available to authorized Atlas users.

Full 483 report

Get the verbatim text of all 6 observations

The source PDF and every observation in full, so your team sees exactly what was cited and how it was answered.

  • The site's full inspection history around this Form 483
  • Whether these citations escalated to a warning letter
  • The investigators involved and the citations they repeat elsewhere